The Judge Translator
Explain your most technical argument to three imaginary judges (a parent, a teacher, a college debater), adjusting vocabulary and depth for each.
Pick your most jargon-heavy argument. Give it three times, one minute each: first to a parent judge who has never seen debate (no jargon at all), then to a teacher judge (some structural language is fine), then to a flow judge (full technical delivery).
Your partner plays each judge and interrupts as soon as anything is unclear: "What does uniqueness mean?" Rephrase on the spot without talking down to them.
PF is judged by all three of these people, sometimes at the same tournament. The champions aren’t the debaters with the best arguments. They’re the ones whose best arguments still make sense to any listener.