Delivery Fundamentals
Pace, signposting, and tone that make judges want to flow for you.
PF judges are often lay parents, teachers, or community volunteers. They can’t vote for arguments they didn’t hear or couldn’t follow, so delivery is how your arguments reach the judge in the first place.
Pace: fast enough to cover, slow enough to track
Aim for clarity over speed. If the judge stops writing, you are going too fast. Signpost before each new argument ("On our first contention, economy…") and pause briefly between contentions. Record yourself, too. The gap between how fast you think you speak and how fast you actually speak is embarrassing, and you can fix it.
Signposting and structure
Signposts are verbal road signs: "Turn to our second contention," "On their case, two responses," "In summary, we collapse to…" Judges flow in columns, and signposts tell them which column to write in. Without them, even a good rebuttal lands in the wrong row and gets lost.
Tone
Be confident without being aggressive. PF is persuasive speaking, and shouting doesn’t persuade anyone. Make eye contact with the judge when you crystallize impacts, and sound like you believe your arguments. After all that prep, you should.
A ten-minute delivery session
- 1
Record two minutes cold
Deliver a summary from your flow without rehearsing. You will be cold in a real round, too.
- 2
Listen for one variable only
This week it is filler words; next week, signposting. Critiquing everything at once changes nothing, so pick one thing.
- 3
Mark where the judge would stop writing
Any stretch where you sped up, ran two arguments together, or skipped a signpost. Those are the places your argument disappears.
- 4
Redeliver the same speech
Same content and same flow, fixing only the one variable. The difference between take one and take two is what the exercise is for.
Practice what you learned
Speaking Redos
Deliver the same one-minute speech three times, cutting filler words and tightening delivery on every pass.
15 min, soloThe Judge Translator
Explain your most technical argument to three imaginary judges (a parent, a teacher, a college debater), adjusting vocabulary and depth for each.
15 min, partnerCheck your understanding
Question 1 of 2